Agribusiness Economics and Management Section Track Sessions
1011
Social Media and Firm Response to Information in the Supply Chain
Monday, 9:30 AM–11:00 AM
Washington State Convention Center, Level 3, Room 309
Agribusiness Economics and Management (AEM) Track Session
Information technology allows firms greater ability to network and communication with stakeholders in their supply chain. This session analyzes industry-level and firm-level responses to information technology, with specific regards to how firms utilize information to manage risks within their supply chain. The papers in this session focus on different aspects of the supply chain including factors that influence firms use of social media, how producers are using social media to network with input suppliers, the ability of firms to effectively use social media as a marketing and/or promotional tool, and implications of firms' responses to product recall information.
Organizer: Michelle L. Santiago, Sam Houston State University
Moderator: Michelle L. Santiago, Sam Houston State University
Presentations:
Factors Influencing Local Agribusiness's Social Media Use
Michelle L. Santiago and Julie Cooper, Sam Houston State University
Firm Response to Food Recalls Information: Implications for Welfare Effects
William E. Nganje and Timothy J. Richards, Arizona State University; Victoria Salin, Texas A&M University
The Communication Divide Among Wine and Agricultural Business Professionals Is the Facebook Factor. What Is Next?
Marianne McGarry Wolf, California Polytechnic State Univ
1036
Structural Changes in the Agrifood System and the Future of Cooperatives
Monday, 1:00 PM–2:30 PM
Washington State Convention Center, Level 3, Room 304
Agribusiness Economics and Management (AEM) Track Session
The global agrifood system has seen tremendous changes in the last decade, including technological and institutional changes, globalization, consolidation, vertical coordination and the emergence of new organizational forms. In addition, commodity markets have become increasingly volatile leading to higher levels of uncertainty. At the same time, population growth and rising incomes primarily in developing countries and changing food habits in the developed world suggest a wide array of opportunities for growth. Agrifood system participants that successfully adapt to these changes are able to survive and benefit from these emerging opportunities. This section will discuss structural changes occurring at the farm level and in upstream and downstream stages of the agrifood value chain. Presenters will also analyze the effects and implications of these changes to farmer-owned cooperatives and how they are adapting to a more global and uncertain environment.
Organizer: Fabio R. Chaddad, University of Missouri
Moderator: Fabio R. Chaddad, University of Missouri
Presentations:
Structural Changes in Agribusiness: Challenges and Opportunities for Cooperatives
Michael Boehlje, Purdue University
The Future of US Agricultural Cooperatives: An Update
Michael L. Cook, University of Missouri
Structural Changes in US Agriculture and their Implications for Cooperatives
Michael E. Sykuta, University of Missouri
1063
Using Surveys to Establish a Successful Research Agenda
Monday, 4:30 PM–6:00 PM
Washington State Convention Center, Level 2, Room 214
Agribusiness Economics and Management (AEM) and Graduate Student Section (GSS) Track Session
The establishment of a successful research agenda is paramount to any individual wishing to succeed in academia. Given the variety of techniques and concepts, survey methodology as a form of primary data collection often intimidates researchers. This session will discuss how individuals can use surveys as a tool to help establish a successful research agenda. Topics discussed will include basic survey concepts, use of design and incentives to influence responses and response rates, and effectiveness of survey modes. Researchers will also discuss their effective use of surveys with groups at different stages in the supply chain, as well as tips and pitfalls of the survey process.
Organizers: Michelle L. Santiago, Sam Houston State University; Aslihan D. Spaulding, Illinois State University
Panelists: Michelle L. Santiago, Sam Houston State University; Aslihan D. Spaulding, Illinois State University; Danna Moore, Washington State Univ; Wuyang Hu, University of Kentucky
2005
Reputation and Organizational Legitimacy: Implications for Firms in the Global Agri-food and Fiber Supply Chain
Tuesday, 10:00 AM–11:30 AM
Washington State Convention Center, Level 2, Room 214
Agribusiness Economics and Management (AEM) and Institutional and Behavioral Economics Section (IBES) Track Session
Legitimacy and reputation, both are intangible assets that influence the economic viability of organizations. Indeed these two assets are bestowed upon firms by society as an indication of their approval of what an organization is doing. Firms gain or lose in their reputation for social and/or environmental performance, by respectively leading or lagging behind in the evolution of societal expectations concerning various issues of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Moreover, if society feels that a firm falls too far behind or is to forward in their response to CSR issues they are likely to lose organizational legitimacy. Consequently, the papers in this track session examine the issues of legitimacy and reputation on firms that operate in the global agri-food and fiber supply chain.
Organizer: Joshua D. Detre, Louisiana State University
Presentations:
Does One Bad Apple Spoil the Bunch? An Exploration of Legitimacy Loss for Innocent Firms under Food Recall Situations
Whitney O. Peake, Murray State University; Joshua D. Detre, Louisiana State University; Michael A. Gunderson, University of Florida; Clinton C. Carlson, University of Northern Texas
Challenges Facing New Business Ventures: A Legitimacy Approach
Robert Brent Ross, Michigan State University; Miguel I. Gomez, Cornell University; Fabio R. Chaddad, University of Missouri
Legitimacy and the Distinction between Moral Exhortations and Moral Prohibitions, or why it “is Confusing to Tell Agribusiness Firms to do this and Don’t Do That
Harvey S. James, Jr., University of Missouri
2034
Alliances in the Small and in the Large: Formation and Performance
Tuesday, 12:30 PM–2:00 PM
Washington State Convention Center, Level 2, Room 213
Agribusiness Economics and Management (AEM) Track Session
Alliances--defined as collaborative, interdependent efforts between two or more firms--are a mainstay of the agricultural economy. Historically, farmers have hedged risk and enhanced market access with farmer-owned cooperatives and landlord-tenant sharecropping alliances. Nowadays, small farms engaged in the local food movement use alliances to facilitate information and resource exchange, while seed-developing biotechnology firms use alliances to foster innovation and appropriate its returns. But what determines alliance formation and performance? What makes one alliance successful, resulting in risk sharing, information exchange, and greater returns to scale, while another alliance results in a clash over intellectual property rights, as illustrated by Monsanto vs. Dupont? This session draws together strands from the literature on alliances among publicly listed firms with innovative research on small, privately-held farms to answer these questions and illustrate the uniqueness and similarities of alliances across industries and firm size. This session examines the impact of alliances at three focal lengths: 1) the ultimate outcome, firm survival, 2) the persistence of above-average profits among surviving firms, and 3) mechanisms persistently profitable firms use to facilitate information exchange and innovation while decreasing the threat of information expropriation. These perspectives combine to provide unique insight into the organization of firms along the food supply chain, from biotech firms to farms to agribusiness.
Organizer: Andrea Martens, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Discussant: Peter D. Goldsmith, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Presentations:
Too Connected to Fail: The Effect of Alliance Network Structure on Farm Survival
Andrea Martens and Barrett E. Kirwan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The Effect of Alliances on the Persistence of Profits
Fabio R. Chaddad, University of Missouri; Sergio Lazzarini, Insper
Interlocking Directorates in Agricultural Enterprises in Scania, Sweden
Konstantinos Karantininis, University of Copenhagen; Thomas Björklund, n/a; Jerker Nilsson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences